1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
