1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Rover 800
To start off, 1996 Rover 800 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Rover 800. (174 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1996 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Rover 800 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 62 | 800 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |
