1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 1997 Acura EL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1997 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 996 kg more than 1997 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | EL |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2619 mm |