1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | TL |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |