1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1997 Alfa Romeo 146. (129 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1997 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 62 | 146 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1712 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
