1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. (88 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 935 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | A |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 54 L |