1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 414i |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1460 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |