1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Tata E
To start off, 1997 Tata E is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1997 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1997 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Tata E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | 62 | E |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |
