1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Ford Tracer
To start off, 1998 Ford Tracer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1998 Ford Tracer. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1998 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Ford Tracer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Tracer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
