1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 1998 Mazda Laputa is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1998 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | Laputa |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |