1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mazda MS-9
To start off, 1998 Mazda MS-9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1998 Mazda MS-9.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mazda MS-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | MS-9 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |