1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 (226 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 62 | 166 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |
