1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | SLK |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |