1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | GTO |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
