1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 1999 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Volkswagen W12 (414 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Volkswagen W12 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | W12 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1050 mm |
