1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Fiat Duna
To start off, 2000 Fiat Duna is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Duna. (87 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Duna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 2000 Fiat Duna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Fiat Duna | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Duna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1581 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
