1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Honda Z
To start off, 2000 Honda Z is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2000 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1070 kg more than 2000 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Honda Z | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Z |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |