1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Rover 45. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 920 kg more than 2000 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 62 | 45 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
