1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford Laser
To start off, 2001 Ford Laser is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2001 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 960 kg more than 2001 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford Laser | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Laser |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
