1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |