1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. (91 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mercedes-Benz A | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | A |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1898 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
