1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Verada
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Verada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 208 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 565 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Verada.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mitsubishi Verada | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Verada |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |