1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | MM |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |