1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 715 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 51 L |