1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 640 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | 62 | Evanda |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |