1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 777 kg more than 2002 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 101 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |
