1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 880 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
