1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3040 mm |
