1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 644 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |