1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 876 kg more than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | 62 | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 76 L |