1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2002 TVR T 350 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 2002 TVR T 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | 62 | T 350 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
