1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |