1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Citroen C8
To start off, 2003 Citroen C8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C8. (134 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 388 kg more than 2003 Citroen C8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Citroen C8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | C8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |