1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (222 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 497 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | X-Type |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |