1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2003 Mahindra Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | 62 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4310 mm |
