1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Morgan Aero 8
To start off, 2003 Morgan Aero 8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Morgan Aero 8 (282 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Morgan Aero 8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1028 kg more than 2003 Morgan Aero 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Morgan Aero 8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
| Model | 62 | Aero 8 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
