1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Subaru B
To start off, 2003 Subaru B is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru B (389 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru B should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2003 Subaru B.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Subaru B | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 62 | B |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
