1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Bora.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | 62 | Bora |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |