1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2003 Westfield ZEI is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Westfield ZEI. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1360 kg more than 2003 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | 62 | ZEI |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |
