1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Astro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 102 L |