1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 775 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |