1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
