1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2004 Lancia Musa is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2004 Lancia Musa. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2004 Lancia Musa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Lancia Musa | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | 62 | Musa |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |