1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Maybach 62
To start off, 2004 Maybach 62 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maybach 62 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maybach 62 weights approximately 775 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maybach |
| Model | 62 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 110 L |
