1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 276 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | E |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1799 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 78 L |