1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 840 kg more than 2004 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 MG TF | |
| Make | Cadillac | MG |
| Model | 62 | TF |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
