1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |