1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
