1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 488 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1542 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |