1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (325 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Lumina.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Lumina |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1660 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |